Still waiting on my monitor profiling hardware/software to arrive in the post, so then will continue with phase 2 of Profile Prism where you edit the first profile from the scan, but need a truly accurate monitor. So I guess that "drowns" any odd missing holes so you don't have to worry needlessly about them.
#CANON IP3000 REVIEWS FULL#
I noted that the Pixma nozzle check printout still makes the "lattice" print for the black pigment cartridge but the (office printer) iP3000 then makes solid blocks of full head width for the CYM. Maybe that's the way the Pixma is headed, many more smaller head holes and it maybe doesn't matter too much if a few go on holiday. Lucky I had a spare S820 bought at a closeout sale. The S820 had a whole mess of clogs I couldn't shift, but the interesting bit is that photo prints I've produced recently still looked fine to me. In another post I was boasting that my old S820 never clogs - well - I was getting slightly funny test prints when closely examining the Profile Prism scan. Oh yes, a nightmare day! Tried to make 4 profiles, 2 papers on 2 printers. Use the Canon ICM.Ī Canon digital camera at default settings working with a Canon printer using their profile must really make cartoon colours! I prefer real colours. Easy for me.Ĭonclusion: If you want to add 'POP' to your photographs and notĬoncerned with color accuracy. Well, others did that, I just summarised. Old Canon S820 and see what a generation or two of printerĭevelopment can do when when comparing old 6 colour to new 3 colour Today a careful profiling session and then compare the iP3000 to my
#CANON IP3000 REVIEWS PRO#
Meanwhile I did try Pro Glossy and Plus Glossy in the iP3000 withĪll photo enhancements turned on but no ICM and the result was One poster said the ICMs are for Adobe RGB files and not sRGB, oneĭay I'll get to try them all and see what happens.īut then I do use Profile Prism to profile my papers so may never Thanks, I tried a bit harder with my search and deduced the If color accuracy is important, then use your own paper profile. ProfilePrism's ICM was pretty close to what I see on my profiled monitor.Ĭonclusion: If you want to add 'POP' to your photographs and not concerned with color accuracy. I think Canon adds 'POP' to their profile. Canon's ICM added more color (pink) to faces and (blue) to the background.
I did a little testing, using Qimage SoftProof and found out Canon's ICM did not look like my profiled monitor. Just for kicks, I printed out some pictures using Canon's ICM profile using Qimage and was really suprised at how good the prints came out.
I just bought the Canon i9900 and profiled Canon's Plus and Pro paper with ProfilePrism. Thanks for decoding the MP2=Matte Q2, SP4=PlusGlossy Q4, etc. Today a careful profiling session and then compare the iP3000 to my old Canon S820 and see what a generation or two of printer development can do when when comparing old 6 colour to new 3 colour printing. Better than an average photo lab gives me. Meanwhile I did try Pro Glossy and Plus Glossy in the iP3000 with all photo enhancements turned on but no ICM and the result was surprisingly good for a 3 colour print. One poster said the ICMs are for Adobe RGB files and not sRGB, one day I'll get to try them all and see what happens.īut then I do use Profile Prism to profile my papers so may never bother to test the Canon ICMs. Thanks, I tried a bit harder with my search and deduced the following.Ĭanon iP3000 MP2 CNB61DB0.ICM = Matte Paper Quality 2Ĭanon iP3000 PR1 CNB61CA0.ICM = Pro Glossy Quality 1Ĭanon iP3000 PR2 CNB61CB0.ICM = Pro Glossy Quality 2Ĭanon iP3000 SP2 CNB61EB0.ICM = Plus Glossy Quality 2Ĭanon iP3000 SP4 CNB61ED0.ICM = Plus Glossy Quality 4 While ago, do a search, maybe on Canon profile, you should find it.
Someone posted a list of description of what they are a little
0 kommentar(er)
